'engineering' is a misnomer. It's
more of genetic experimentation resulting in perverting
that which already works, and works well. It comes with a
severe warning. One example is that genetically modified 'food' does
not give us the correct protein sequence to properly develop the brain,
according to Harvard Ph.D physicist Dr. John Hagelin. His site is www.hagelin.org
Science examines how things work,
analyzing each pertaining variable.
however possess many
providing a labyrinth for study
with obstacles to accurate information that render scientific control and
manipulation impossible; impossible
because God says so. And what have we really
done in biotechnology?
If processes involving genetic
manipulation (like vaccinations
engineered insulin) are the slightest bit in doubt by even a small
portion of the populace, why is legislation avoided to enforce labeling
as in the case of vaccinations? Similarly, labeling is avoided in the case
are such efforts touted as being the
for so many of the world's ills? Extremely costly and so pathetic
are attempts by those duped to pursue
directions sure to end in disaster -Hosea
8:7 "For they have sown the wind and they shall reap the whirlwind;
it hath no stalk; the bud shall yield no meal. If so be it yield, the strangers
shall swallow it up."
Is it in the name of greed couched with altruistic
motives, biotech scientists continue to ignore lessons; one being organic
farming, the other, wisdom of their peers?
It's always more lucrative
to deal with the problems than the causes. Buy the pill for the headache
or sinuses, eh!
Mankind is so incredibly dumb! And
more so, the seemingly more 'educated'. Increasing knowledge without wisdom
is like increasing food lacking adequate nutrition. Something happens and
you're ok, for a while. Then things get difficult; like climbing stairs,
taking long walks, bodily elimination of toxins, etc. Lacking wisdom leads
to dealing with an effect while avoiding causes.
We search for a 'cure'
for cancer and heart disease, while saying little about cause, avoidance
and prevention. And so on and so forth ad
nauseum regarding so much else.
modified foods don't taste better, and in most cases, taste poorly, grow
inconsistently – for example turnips become incredibly hard, more
like rocks at times, brocolli too! They
provide no more nutrition, and often less, and provide greater risk of
allergic reaction as genes are used to produce the proteins and allergies
are associated with introduced proteins.
Genetically modified foods don't cost less
and they don't look nicer, and they aren't a solution for any world hunger
Mother Earth News, April/May, 2000, page 59, "Feeding
the world is not a technology related problem. It is a problem of wealth
and distribution of wealth. It is a problem of politics...." ... Jane Rissler,
senior staff scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a 50,000
member non profit watchdog group concerned with the misuse of science and
Greernpeace, Council of Canadians and Sierra Club endorse Families for
a Safe Food Supply. For more see www.chfa.ca.
35 countries require mandatory
labeling of biotech foods (genetically modified foods). Canada's labelling
requirements are voluntary, and that's fine, it is a free country. But,
can trust organic.
Man's efforts are laudable, yet
to him to waste his time, heading him off in directions that mostly concern
him only with this life.
Thinking he can thoroughly solve problems without God's guidance approaches
and leads man mostly into a whole new set of them -2Corinthians
3:5 "Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think anything as of
ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God."
these agri giants want to feed the world why are they then trying to sell
genetically engineered crops in North America and Europe? Jane says "There
is not a great rush to develop products for the developing world...One
cannot conclude that this technology has been proven to increase yield
or to substantially reduce pesticide use across the board. So our question
is: With so little benefit why are farmers and consumers being asked to
take any risk?"
Any scientist will tell you that mammalian testing requires at least three
generations of observation and study. And it's also certain that pests
will easily build up a tolerance to any 'built in' pesticides engineered
into food crops. Then what?
United States of America congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) has introduced
the 'Genetically Engineered Food Right To Know Act' (House resolution 3377).
Because genetically modified food has no present label requirements, once
consumers use them, affects can't be tracked.
Is there a hidden agenda? Perhaps one to 'engineer' people? And one that
even the researchers unwittingly may be following?
Only a fool would tamper
with the building blocks of life. Negative results occur with GMOs (genetically
modified organisms) including genetically modified maize (corn)
intelligence is often to just leave things alone, and/or get in line with
how to make and optimally maintain
the body; not push the envelope and upset the balance.-...continue?