C h r i s t i a n  K e y s
F l u o r i d e
G e n e t i c  E n g i n e e r i n g
G l o b a l  W a r m i n g
.
F-l u o r i d e
-March,-1999: New York State Department of Health compared results in Newburgh, New York, which has been fluoridated for 50 years, with Kingston, New York, which has never been fluoridated. In Newburgh there were more cavities, discoloring and dental floursis. 

-How it all started

-Fluoridation's Safety: Contrary Information

-Fluoride and cancer

-U.S.A. denies safety of fluoride

-the words "stannous fluoride" sound better than fluoride combined with tin.

-Toothpaste: How Safe?

-Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides

-Exposure to high fluoride concentrations in drinking water is associated with decreased birth rates.

-Effect of long term administration of sodium fluoride on plasma calcium level in relation to intestinal absorption and urinary excretion in rabbits.

-A report commissioned by the Canadian Federal Government and the Province of Ontario-(Toothpaste: How Safe?)

-United States Department of Health: 
      Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Sodium Fluoride

June 19-21, 1998, The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT ) cohosted a symposium as a final step in developing a public health goal (PHG) for ingested fluoride. 
    We firmly agree with the findings of the November 1997 Canadian Dental Association conference on fluoride drops and tablets which found no reliable scientific evidence of significant dental benefit from ingested fluoride. The IAOMT has received scientific input for this PHG from more than a dozen sources.
    Adverse health effects demonstrated were: fluorosis; cancers;
genetic damage; bone pathology; trans placental and brain transport;
histological brain, artery, and kidney damage; and neurological
impairment. 

On July 2, 1997, the EPA scientists, engineers and attorneys who assess the scientific data for Safe Drinking Water Act standards (why you should only drink spring water these days) and other EPA regulations, have gone on record against the practice of adding fluoride to public drinking water. The National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 2050, states, "It is our hope that our cosponsorship of the Safe Drinking Water Initiative to prohibit fluoridation will have a beneficial effect on the health and welfare of all Californians by helping to keep their water free of a chemical substance for which there is substantial evidence of adverse health effects and, contrary to public perception, virtually no evidence of significant benefits." 
    Subsets of the Population are at Risk for the Toxic Effects of Fluoride: According to the 1993 Dept. of Health and Human Services: "Existing data indicate that subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, and/or vitamin C, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems." 
    Freedom of Choice for the Individual: Individuals should not be involuntarily exposed to fluoride when there is long term and abundant evidence of fluoride's harmful health effects, plus no public health crisis or condition that demands mandatory exposure.-...continue?

Subject Sampler_List of Topics_Search
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
Questions Lists_Free Stuff_Entrance
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.