C r e a t i o n ,  P a g e  8 5
.
 
Evolution's faith is evidenced in evolutionists finding a tooth and with a little imagination constructing two entire humans, Nebraskaman (Hesperopithecus haroldcookii) and Nebraskawoman. 
    Similar is Peking man (Sinanthropus), from another single tooth, and some skulls; which skulls all having holes in the back of them, were used to prove Peking man's one time existence. They were revealed to be monkey skulls natives would bash in to extract their delicious brains, just like in Indiana Jones: Temple of Doom.
    Similar is Java man (Homo erectus), but from 3 teeth and a skullcap and thigh bone; the thigh bone being found a year later only 50 feet from the others. A 342 page scientific report was done on Java man (Pithecanthropus erectus – ape man). According to the (honest) evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith, The Antiquity of Man (1925), Williams and Norgate, Ltd. London, England, Volume 2, pages 440-441, as quoted in Lubenow, The Selenka Expedition, page 102, "demonstrates beyond the peradventure of a doubt that Java man played no part in human evolution." Pages 113-119 have a good review of the expedition.-
    Another torn down steeple for evolution was the fraud Piltdown man (Eoanthropus dawsoni). Check a dictionary for Piltdown man. 
    And others (hey, these guys stop at nothing it seems in attempts to support what they want you to accept as veracity. Why?) are the Peppered Moths and Neanderthal Man.
    And let's not forget our friend a whale that walks, and Lucy.
    If evolution was true, and if evolution was a real faith, it would spur some actions. We would stop putting fluoride in the water supply, so our bodies could evolve the protection that natural selection senses it needs. We would stop sweetening up various foods, so our tastes could properly fumction. 
    Let's not wear warm clothes, and let's not put garbage into our minds, so we can adapt to temperature, and evolve a pure mind. Let's stop all research as it may lead to eventual interference with the natural development and adaption of things. No more "Dolly" the genetically engineered sheep; no more 'frankenfood' either. 
    To evolution to have an unfettered (free from any restraint) hand to work properly, we must also stop preserving the lives of those with hereditary diseases, so they can be an important cog in the evolutionary machine to develop a better disease free species. We must allow natural selection to run its full and proper course, mustn't we? Then we should stop all AIDS, malaria research, etc. If you're against this, then how can you be for evolution? If so, you remain in a confused state of mind? If anything evolution can affect is interfered with, the process of natural selection can be hindered. So what's your idea of progressive – evolution, or dealing with the problems to help people now? And if we are dealing as best we can with the problems requiring attention today, are we tacitly saying evolution is retrogressive? And if we are not saying that, then how confused are we?
    Evolution is based on the nature of competition (survival of the fittest) for scarce resources, so why not stop all food production so we can evolve the capacity to exist without it? The daughter of evolution is competition, so let's stop all cooperating, so evolution can run rampant. Evolutionary scientists must then be hypocritical, as they do cooperate. While espousing evolution's veracity, most of the world's efforts go into interfering with its processes. 
    If we help evolution along by forced sterilization of the mentally challenged (which has happened in North America), and genetic engineering of crops and humans, then are we hindering evolution's sacred path? Hmmm! Maybe the genetic scientists don't really believe in evolution; even though many have said that they do. Very confusing. Maybe they just believe whatever whenever it suits their purposes. And we allow them power in genetic manipulation? Scary, but just all part of the confused world.
    Maybe people are smarter than Einstein thought, for he said that there were two things that he felt were infinite; the Universe and human stupidity; and he said he wasn't quite sure about the Universe.
    Tell me, what disease in all of evolution's supposed history, has natural selection through its mutative adaptive processes eliminated?
    Darwin 'mustabinondrugs' thinking his theory of evolution had anything to do with progress!
    Yet many evolutionists hold fast to this badly damaged non theory. (my silly comments in red)
    Lewis Wolpert, FRS, professor of biology as applied to medicine at University College, London, England, As In Evolution: Society, Science, and the University, (1998), Cambridge University Press, page 37, "The arrival (just 'arrived' huh?) of the cell some 30 million years ago (is he really sure of the date, and if not, it can't be all that important, right?) can be regarded (why can it be regarded that way and not some other way?) as the Big Bang of biological evolution, even though it took a very long time (no kidding huh!; a very loooooong time). The evolution (of the cell's) development is linked (must be somehow linked he figures) to the origin (some other origin he's talking of now) of multi cellular forms (so, let's see, one cell somehow came, and multi cell ones somehow came too, and then, magico bingo, these microscopic organisms somehow found each other). The eukaryotic forms are thought to have been ("are thought to have been" means, he's unsure) present…I suggest (now he's about to add on to his 'foundation' with a suggestion) all the basic elements required for developing were already present (now he says that actually, a lot more was present; hmmm, I think I'll call this a 'step story' that is; first we have one cell, then apparently multies were there too, and now, all the basic elements were present is this guy at all sure what on earth he's talking about at all?), and the transition to multi cellularity was relatively easy (how easy was it; was there any complexity at all? Does this guy even understand the horrendous complexity of the cell? Nope! Give us a break from all this garbage reasoning, and send this guy back to grade school, so he can tell his kiddy stories to peers!)." (with teachings such as this, it's no wonder many kids can't think and are so confused; and can you believe, somebody even published it? Ha ha ha!)-...continues

Subject Sampler_List of Topics_Search
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
Questions Lists_Free Stuff_Entrance
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.