Evolution's faith is evidenced
in evolutionists finding a tooth and with a little imagination constructing
two entire humans, Nebraskaman (Hesperopithecus haroldcookii) and Nebraskawoman.
Similar is Peking
man (Sinanthropus), from another single tooth, and some skulls; which skulls
all having holes in the back of them, were used to prove Peking man's one
time existence. They were revealed to be monkey skulls natives would bash
in to extract their delicious brains, just like in Indiana
Jones: Temple of Doom.
Similar is Java
erectus), but from 3 teeth and a skullcap and thigh bone; the thigh
bone being found a year later only 50 feet from the others. A 342 page
scientific report was done on Java man (Pithecanthropus erectus – ape man).
According to the (honest) evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith, The
Antiquity of Man (1925), Williams and Norgate, Ltd.
London, England, Volume 2, pages 440-441, as quoted in Lubenow, The
Selenka Expedition, page 102, "demonstrates beyond
the peradventure of a doubt that Java man played no part in human evolution."
Pages 113-119 have a good review of the expedition.-
down steeple for evolution was the fraud Piltdown man (Eoanthropus dawsoni).
Check a dictionary for Piltdown man.
And others (hey,
these guys stop at nothing it seems in attempts to support what they want
you to accept as veracity. Why?)
are the Peppered Moths and
And let's not
forget our friend a whale
that walks, and Lucy.
was true, and if evolution
was a real faith, it would spur some actions. We would stop putting fluoride
in the water supply, so our bodies could evolve the protection that
natural selection senses it needs. We would stop sweetening up various
foods, so our tastes could properly fumction.
Let's not wear
warm clothes, and let's not put garbage into our minds, so we can adapt
to temperature, and evolve a pure mind. Let's stop all research as it may
lead to eventual interference with the natural development and adaption
of things. No more "Dolly" the genetically
engineered sheep; no more 'frankenfood' either.
to have an unfettered (free from any restraint) hand to work properly,
we must also stop preserving the lives of those with hereditary diseases,
so they can be an important cog in the evolutionary machine to develop
a better disease free species. We must allow natural selection to run its
full and proper course, mustn't we? Then we should stop all AIDS, malaria
research, etc. If you're against this, then how can you be for evolution?
If so, you remain in a confused state of mind? If anything evolution can
affect is interfered with, the
process of natural selection can be hindered. So what's your idea of progressive
– evolution, or dealing with the problems to help people now? And if we
are dealing as best we can with the problems requiring attention today,
are we tacitly saying evolution is
And if we are not saying that, then how confused are we?
based on the nature of competition (survival of the fittest) for scarce
resources, so why not stop all food production so we can evolve the capacity
to exist without it? The daughter of evolution is competition, so let's
stop all cooperating, so evolution can run rampant.
Evolutionary scientists must then be hypocritical,
as they do cooperate. While espousing
evolution's veracity, most of
the world's efforts go into interfering with its processes.
If we help evolution
along by forced sterilization of the mentally challenged (which has happened
in North America), and genetic engineering of crops and humans, then are
we hindering evolution's sacred path? Hmmm! Maybe the genetic scientists
don't really believe in evolution; even though many have said that they
do. Very confusing. Maybe they just believe whatever whenever it suits
their purposes. And we allow them power in genetic manipulation? Scary,
but just all part of
people are smarter than Einstein thought,
for he said that there were two things that he felt were infinite; the
Universe and human stupidity; and he said he wasn't quite sure about the
Tell me, what
disease in all of evolution's supposed history, has natural selection through
its mutative adaptive processes
thinking his theory of evolution had anything
to do with progress!
Yet many evolutionists
hold fast to this badly damaged
theory. (my silly comments in red)
FRS, professor of biology as applied to medicine at University College,
London, England, As In Evolution: Society, Science, and the
University, (1998), Cambridge University Press, page
37, "The arrival (just 'arrived'
huh?) of the cell some 30 million
years ago (is he really sure of the
date, and if not, it can't be all that important, right?) can
be regarded (why can it be regarded
that way and not some other way?)
as the Big Bang of biological evolution, even though it took a very long
time (no kidding huh!; a very
loooooong time). The evolution
(of the cell's) development is linked (must
be somehow linked he figures)
to the origin (some other origin he's
talking of now) of
multi cellular forms (so,
let's see, one cell somehow came, and multi cell ones somehow came too,
and then, magico bingo, these microscopic organisms somehow found each
other). The eukaryotic forms
are thought to have been ("are thought
to have been" means, he's unsure) present…I
suggest (now he's about to add on to
his 'foundation' with a suggestion)
all the basic elements required for developing were already present (now
he says that actually, a lot more was present; hmmm, I think I'll call
this a 'step story' that is; first we have one cell, then apparently multies
were there too, and now, all the basic elements were present –
is this guy at all sure what on earth he's talking about at all?),
and the transition to multi cellularity was relatively easy (how
easy was it; was there any complexity at all? Does this guy even understand
the horrendous complexity of the cell? Nope!
Give us a break from all this garbage reasoning, and send this guy back
to grade school, so he can tell his kiddy stories to peers!)."
teachings such as this, it's no wonder many kids can't think and are so
confused; and can you believe, somebody even published it? Ha ha ha!)-...continues
Sampler_List of Topics_Search