Schools unfortunately teach
Evolution as an article of blind faith; that it must have happened.
problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose
horizons are limited by the obvious realities. We need men who can dream
of things that never were." ...John F. Kennedy.
I think evolutionists
only understood the last line of President Kennedy's comment.
In this the entire purpose of education-(the
word means 'to bring forth from within the innate
essential characteristics of the
spirit that makes us what it is we are as individual human beings').
is the only field in science
where an answer is decided upon, then evidence is searched for to support
the answer selected.
Evolutionists can only come
up with evidences for evolution to someone who already believes in evolution.
It's really a religon and a blind one at that!
a 'kids fable' for those whose thinking processes are in a primary
stage of development. It's in the same category as.Goldilocks
and the Three Bears. Like hello, why is it some evolutionists seem
unable to progress beyond this primary stage. What
has school done to them? Them seem unable to think! Consider.(from
No parents, no evolution. A species would have to jump from a primitive
form to a fully developed male and female, each with the ability and instinct
to mate; 2) Did
the first animal develop 10% of complete veins, then 20%, and on up to
100%, with veins throughout its entire body and brain? Then how did the
heart slowly develop in the animal and get attached to the veins in the
right spot? How did the blood enter the system? The blood could not enter
before the veins were complete or it would spill out. Where did the blood
come from? Did the blood have red corpuscles, white corpuscles, platelets,
and plasma? At what point in this process of development did the heart
start beating? How did it start beating? What caused it to start beating?
Why does it beat in the way it does? 3)
Did the animal develop a partial stomach, then a complete stomach? After
the stomach was formed, how did the digestive juices enter the stomach?
Where did the hydrochloric acid as part of the digestive juices come from?
What about its kidney and bladder? The animal better not eat anything prior
to this. How did the animal survive during these changes? (And over thousands
of years?) Of course, at the same time the animal's eyes must be fully
developed so it can see its food and his brain must be fully developed
so the animal can control its body to get to the food; Like the heart,
brain, veins, and stomach, all of the organs and systems in the first animal's
body must be fully functional in the first moments of life. This indicates
that evolution couldn't occur, and the fossil record indicates that it
didn't occur!!! In other words, if you cannot come up with a detailed,
feasible scenario of how the first animal developed, the whole evolutionary
theory goes out the window, because it never could have even gotten started!
A theory is only true until the
process fails. In the case of evolution where every single one of the processes
have failed, we must consider that 'doing the same thing over and over
and expecting a different result' is a sign of insanity. Why are we allowing
children to be taught an insane theory? Are those who still accept it as
being true also insane? Why do we 'keep hugging a long since dead horse?
Are there no proven truths to move into?
Or are there
other reasons for hiding the dead horse away and telling others that it's
still alive and showing a 'piece of hair from its mane' as authenticity?
Jobs maybe? Habit? Something to laugh about after people accept it as being
true, like pulling a joke on someone? or, maybe just craziness resulting
from entrenched mass mind programming.
Many evolutionists believe that all adaptations
begin with time and chance.(it's obvious
little, if anything regarding statistical
probability is considered by the 'gung
ho' evolutionist), that is, with random
changes in DNA and hereditary
In evolutionary theory, those chance
mutations that suit an organism better to its environment are preserved
by the process called natural
selection. But the 'invisible god' called natural selection cannot
act until the favored traits arise by mutation, i.e.,
by time and chance.
Evolutionists beginning in the 19th
century argued that design could be explained on the basis of time, chance,
and properties of matter that did not require a Designer. Can you believe
they actually were that stupid back then? Evolution is not good science.
Evolution is not bad science. Fact is, there's absolutely no
real science at all to it. It's simply a fable
for unthinking adults.
In order to
the fraud of evolution, miseducation
or disinformational mental
training is indispensable,
analytical thinking is to be sidestepped and inculcation
of doctrine is achieved through
avoidance of maxims such as "repeating
what others have said, requires education, challenging it requires brains."
Scientific American Magazine:
"Chance plays a part in evolution.(for
example, in the random mutations that can give rise to new traits),
but evolution does not depend on chance to create organisms, proteins,
or other entities. Quite the opposite: natural selection, the principal
known mechanism of evolution, harnesses nonrandom change by preserving
(nonadaptive) ones." [SA 81]
What this part
of the article is saying – 'We dedicated
fanatically religious evolutionists
do indeed believe with all faith, assurance, hope, conviction and pride
– that, evolution is on such solid ground it doesn't have to depend upon
'any little ol thing like chance'.
consider evolution the 'be all end all'
wonderful answer endowing-peons
with belief necessary for comprehension of origins, existence and life
all encompassing – that is, it envelopes, it blankets, it covers, it enwraps,
it surrounds, it achieves, it constitutes, it includes, it encircles everything
about life. Wow! We evolutionists are so excited! We just love it!
'But to believe
so radically, we evolutionists
really have to bypass the fact that our beloved natural
of doctrines provides an inept
explanation regarding the origins of complex self reproducing life forms
– and we, the most highly trained, the most throughly educated, the most
remarkably and specially focused educated elite
the world has ever seen, really have no way to explain this essential step
in our evolutionary belief of life, but hey, what the hell, we're so indoctrinated
in evolution we believe it anyway!' Gung
ho brother! Praise Darwin!
A sincere scientist's goal must
be to weigh all the relevant evidence to determine which is the more logical
from the weight, on balance, of scientific observations.
God having a purpose for humans. Evolution places human destiny in man's
based on an ancient ugly primordial soup mankind is supposed to have come
from, perhaps something like the movies of the 'living dead' staggering
out from a swamp. Contrast God, who created mankind after making such a
beautiful garden for them to inhabit.
sincerely believe it's ok to teach the religion
of evolution as many of them have been duped
into thinking it's objective science. Not believing in the devil makes
it easy for them to be subject to his
Some of the following remarkable
information comes from Darwin's
Black Box, a book by Michael Behe, Professor of Biochemistry. 'Black
Box' because many of the component parts are unknown, as Darwin
you too may shake your head in wonder after reading all this.(about
15-18 hours if you follow all the links, dictionary explanations, etc.).that
in an age providing quantitative
information, why there is such incomprehensible
ignorance? In fact after reading it all, or a good chunk of it, you may
want to entirely forget the word evolution in its connotation
regarding its pathetic attempts
in accounting for existence, because you will be-awed
by how fantastically brilliant the mind of the Great Engineer-–-the
Rather than proofs of evolution,
all that evolutionists can come up with are evidences for evolution to
some other unthinking soul who already has accepted evolution as true?
4 nights TV for most of you! And I guarantee you'll have infinitely more
knowledge than you'll get watching the stupor-box,
unless, of course, you watch the channels and/or programs where you can
really learn something interesting that broadens your perspective of life
and that which supports and/or affects it in some way – like Discovery
Channel, The Learning Channel, PBS, Access Channel-(in
Canada-(Home and Garden Television
channel)-where they have such
an incredible program called-The
Secret World of Gardens, all about the habits
of insects, snakes, etc. inhabiting your garden. What was brought out was
astounding! The photography in this program is incredible and the presentation
is entirely first class. Most highly recommended! One of the most
interesting and enjoyable presentations ever seen on television; a critically
acclaimed television series, nominated in 6 categories at the upcoming
Gemini Awards including Best Documentary Series, Best Nature/Environment/Science
Program and Best Direction in a Documentary Series.
In here you'll find out why evolutionists
rely upon qualitative-
when quantitative scientific information is readily
to I n d e x