C r e a t i o n ,  P a g e  3 5
-
 
Thank God man hasn't discovered how the other 97% works! He's already screwin' up some of the 3% he thinks he understands.
    "What we do not see is a world in which everything obeys instructions coded in its DNA, and nothing else matters...We must turn at least some attention to life's other secret, the universal mathematical principles of growth and form that DNA exploit." ...Ian Stewart, Ph.D., Royal Society of England's Michael Faraday Medal winner for outstanding contributions to the public understanding of science, mathematics writer for Scientific American in the column 'Mathematical Recreations', and mathematics consultant to New Scientist Magazine, author of Does God Play Dice?, Fearful Symmetry, Collapse of Chaos, Nature's Numbers, and Life's Other Secret, (1998), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Consider the whole creation! Such brilliance, such intelligence is exhibited. To have put it all together, all at once, and have it all function so well, so very well, is of astounding intelligent ability.
    The system we live in is perfectly habitable-for us. The 'How Great Thou Art' hymn, is really an understatement of just how great this Being who (who looks like us) is the epitome of brilliance, intelligence, alertness, insight, knowledge, and design ability () that is called God is -Isaiah 46:9,10 ".....I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." 
    For example, without one complex process –-photosynthesis, we would not be here.

The human egg over time develops into 30 trillion (American) cells and we have the human body including the brain having 12 billion cells, and forming more than 120 trillion connections. Animals similarly are as complicated. And likewise are the supportive systems sustaining diverse life on the Earth.
    Even if man had all the materials to work with for the beginnings of life's species, can you see all the problems trying to get it right and all working together properly? Keep this in mind as you read through the differences in but a snapshot of the workings of this marvelous creation.
    If evolution be true, it's too fast for the eons of time assigned to evolution! During development, the fertilized egg progresses over thirty eight weeks from a single cell to a human being; or from an evolutionist's standpoint – from a primordial cell, the conceptus progresses through being a protozoan, a fish, a reptile, a bird, a primate, and ultimately a human being. Of course in the light of DNA evidence, it can be clearly seen that the DNA for a fetus is not the DNA for a frog.
    The DNAs of a fetus, frog, fish or fly are uniquely programmed for reproduction after their kind. Many people however, are too busy defending conjecture, to check and see what's true in the first place.
    The very first 'anything' had to have already 'evolved' the reproduction system, in order to produce descendants. We have our timed biological systems, which evolutionists misconstrue or at least mislabel as micro evolution in action. Its important to pursue a thorough understanding regarding dormant characteristics within cells examples: puberty (cells that are 'told' by proteins when to divide and how to organize), the role of active genes, new pathways bacteria develop in response to certain stimuli, brain development, menopause in all these, cells are 'told' when to alter chemical systems by a complex gene related mechanism
    This built in programming is encoded and shows organisms have built in genetic mechanisms for rapid variation. Calling it micro activity producing macro output may be correct, but calling it micro evolution is misappropriation.
    The more genes there are, the more complexity to discover in their interactions. Evolutionists have accepted-the erroneous teaching that mutation and natural selection or any other non intelligent process brings about an increase in complexity. 
    Evolutionists erroneously assume that mutation and natural selection leads to an increase in complexity – evolving into an advanced species. 
    Menopause is unique. Only humans and the Pilot whale appear to have it. Why in the animal world just this whale? Is God throwin' us curves again? The collective emergent-phenomena-(adaption of species, like the finch's beak), the small unending procession of changes, are simply natural expressions of the laws undergirding complexity. 
    At the annual session of the American Scientific Association, Harvard University, the celebrated Professor Agassiz remarked "We find that young animals, of almost all classes, within the egg, differ widely from what they are in their full grown condition. We find, too, that the young bat, or bird, or the young serpent, in certain periods of their growth, resemble one another so much that I would defy any one to tell one from the other or discern between a bat and a snake."
    Like a flower, where there is also much similarity; they come from pollinated seeds, have petals, stamen, pistils, green stalks, roots, need the Sun, need pollination, water, nutrients, grow, decompose, etc. Similarity reveals nothing about processes affecting these. For example, taking note of a flower's need for Sunshine tells us nothing about the hidden mathematics involved, or the necessary process of photosynthesis.-...continues

I n d e x-----------------------

Subject Sampler_List of Topics_Search
A_B_C_D_E_F_G_H_I_J_K_L_M_N_O_P_Q_R_S_T_U_V_W_XYZ
Questions Lists_Free Stuff_Entrance
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
.